Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc

Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc

Blog Article

9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair to your offender along with the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts Nonetheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a lot of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

How much sway case regulation holds may possibly change by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances from the current case. To discover this concept, evaluate the following case legislation definition.

Given that the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is arrived at, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of your Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based within the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of your case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more

This is because transfer orders are typically viewed as within the administrative discretion of the employer. However, there can be exceptions in cases where the transfer is motivated by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They might have grounds to challenge before the appropriate forum. Read more

As the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been achieved, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in aid on the Supreme Court, ensuring the enforcement of its judgments. As being the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is attained, the decision of your Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. Read more

Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons having their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to get inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and important cases of international law supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service is the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to complete absent with the candidature from the petitioner. Read more

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, Additionally it is a properly-established proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.

139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Concerning the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 from the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is just not served, the grievance petition is often dismissed. This is because service from the grievance notice is really a mandatory necessity and also a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The regulation necessitates that a grievance notice be served within the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In the event the organization is transprovincial.

Federalism also plays a major role in determining the authority of case regulation in the particular court. Indeed, Each and every circuit has its very own list of binding case law. Consequently, a judgment rendered within the Ninth Circuit will not be binding within the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.

These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and consist of all notable cases decided because of the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.

Since the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be attained, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may well search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more